Mallory Law Office
- Oct 22, 2013
- 1 min read

Choice of Law Provisions in Non-Compete Agreements.

A recent federal case in Ohio emphasizes the importance of examining choice of law provisions in your non-compete agreements.

From the Ohio Employer’s Law Blog:

Choice of law is one of the most important, and, often, most ignored decisions you can making in drafting a non-competition agreement. Lifestyle Improvement Centers, LLC v. East Bay Health, LLC (S.D. Ohio 10/7/13), illustrates how the choice of which state’s law will govern the contact can govern the enforceability of the restrictive covenant.

#employmentlaw #NoncompeteAgreements

Recent Posts

See All

How An Employer Can Fund Wages Paid Under The Families First Coronavirus Response Act

Many employers are asking the question: “How can I fund the salaries I must pay to my employees who elect to take sick or medical or family leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act?” It

Creativity in Employment Contracts

Seattle Seahawks football player Eddie Lacy recently received a $55,000 employment bonus – not for his performance on the field, but for weighing a required weight at the beginning of training camp. E

Opening Day Read: Baseball Mascots and the Law

Just in time for Opening Day 2017, Attorney Christian H. Brill and Prof. Howard W. Brill have published a comprehensive examination of legal disputes involving mascots and America’s national pastime.